Close Combat Playtest 

A playtest report sent to us by Howard Whitehouse, the writer of the rules. Enjoy... 
 
My regular gaming partner and opponent Dan Foley agreed that we'd try out a couple of changes to the rules. Both Roderick and Lee had suggested that, instead of the existing 'I hit you/you hit me' system, we let the defender also hit when he scored more successes than the attacker.
 This involved a minor change to let the defender redeploy his figures before combat, but this was straightforward enough. Since we wanted to focus on close combat, 
both Dan's Mohawks and my Huron's split into a larger group on the valley floor, while putting a smaller group of archers across the creek to provide 'arrow support'. Dan outfoxed me in getting his men into a higher position, and my attempts to rush my archers up the  'natural staircase' to the top of the cliff were accompanied by a collection of light wounds - and a kill - from Dan's laughing bowmen. 

Dan's 'close combat force' came forward, and I did the same. He responded by charging into my Huron's as a Reaction, surprising me, and won a round of close combat. My Great Warrior was wounded three times, and a lesser man would have died. However, protected by a gallant (and lucky) war bearer, who fended off Dan's leader, I was able (purely by sheer luck of the dice) to kill his companion in gloriously gory style, and also his stripling. Dan failed his Nerve test and bolted. However, he rolled a total of 5", and my victorious band were easily able to follow up and knock the great warrior to the ground, and bind him as a prisoner. And that won the game. 
 
We tried the suggestion that there just be one round of melee rather than a 'attacker goes first, then defender becomes attacker', so that a successful - say -  Leap Aside hits the opponent rather than simply disengages 
without being hurt. That worked fine, 
although a few more tests will be required to make sure there aren't any unforeseen weird
effects to alter the balance. However, the two-attack method starts with "attacker fights defenders he reaches, plus their immediate supporters" meaning it's possible to attack a spread-out group and deliberately pick on those nearest while keeping the more distant figures out of the fight.

So it would look something like this if pictured from above -- 
 
 X
  X     XX  
        OOOO
 
Where the O's jump on two of the X's while ignoring the others. Then, on their response, the other X's pile in. 

With a 'one resolution' version, the X's use their Reaction to either shoot at the attackers OR move, say one walk distance towards the fight. That way everyone is in position for the close combat. Unless they roll badly. Which seems fair.
So their may have to be some more testing and a rewrite of this rules section to explain the
'one resolution' version. 

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Multi Warband Game

Image
We playtested our first of several mutli War Band games over the past two weeks. These games will be large scenarios that will appear in the rulebook. Our largest game had four War Bands per side. This game had over eighty figures on the board and had Canoes, Shamans and Spirit Creatures involved. It was a very involved game. We had to re work the scenario and played it a couple of times. It was played on a large size table, 48" x 60", but probably could of fit on a bit smaller size set up. We also had to rework the canoe rules to make them more playable. It seems that canoes, although perhaps realistic, moved too slowly to be very playable in the game. We have therefore This is what the Board Set up looked like. A small river which runs through a swamp and empties into a lake. The Defending War Bands had three War Bands on shore waiting by the edge of the lake in the red area. Thefourth War Band entered in canoes in the corner which is also marked in red. The attacker cou
Read more

Hurontario Playtests

Image
I have finished off my other Crucible Crush projects, well just the Star Crush Rulebook, so I have time to focus on the Flint and Feather rules. So we got together to set up our demo games for upcoming conventions which we will be attending which include KegsCon, Council Fires and with the goal of ending at Fall In in November. Then we played through a quick game to gloss up on the rules. It was also Dave's first full game and our objective is to learn the system thoroughly in the next month so we can decide how we want the rules to fall together. So here are some pictures and a synopsis from our demo game. An overhead view of the table showing the setup. The Huron player (Dave) set up three warriors with bows in the woods protecting one of the patrol markers. We were playing a random scenario from the early version of the campaign rules and set up our board according to that system. These three warriors held down the flank and used bows to cause damage to my Iroquois. It wa
Read more

The Haudenosaunee Longhouse

Image
The Iroquois (Haudenosaunee or "People of the Longhouses") and the aboriginal Huron built and inhabited longhouses. These were sometimes more than 100 m (330 ft) in length and generally around 5 to 7 m (16 to 23 ft) wide. The walls were made of hundred of saplings, sharpened and fire hardened, and driven into the ground close together. Bark, with a staple being birch bark, was then woven horizontally through the lines of saplings to shield the families from the weather. Horizontal poles were then used to brace the walls up. The roof was placed on top of these walls by bending saplings, resulting in an arc-shaped roof. Leaves and grasses covered this frame providing a roof structure. This structure was then covered by bark that was sewn in place and layered as shingles, and reinforced by light swag. The Longhouse had doors at each end of the structure which were covered with an animal hide to keep out the cold and the weather. Doors could also be inserted in the s
Read more